Are Equestrian Sports Cruel?

This post may contain affiliate links. If you click one, I may earn a commission at no cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Equestrian sports such as horse racing, show jumping, and dressage have long been popular pastimes and competitive events. However, in recent years, these sports have come under increased scrutiny regarding the ethics and treatment of the horses involved. Critics argue that forcing horses into intensive training regimes and competitive events for human entertainment is inherently cruel. Proponents counter that these sports can be done responsibly and humanely when proper training and care is provided. The debate around equestrian sports raises complex questions about the relationship between humans and horses.

What is Cruelty in Equestrian Sports?

Before examining the arguments on both sides, it is important to define what constitutes cruelty in the context of working with horses. The key markers of cruelty include:

  • Physical harm or damage – Any training methods, equipment, or competitions that cause pain, distress or lasting injury to the horse. This includes excessive use of whips, spurs, and severe bits that can damage the mouth.
  • Psychological distress – Training techniques that rely on fear, intimidation and breaking the horse’s spirit. Shelley Rosenberg, an equine behavior expert, notes that “flooding” horses by exposing them to loud noises and stressful stimuli in order to “desensitize” them often does more harm than good.
  • Deprivation of natural behaviors – Not allowing horses to socialize, graze, roll, and engage in natural activities causes stress. Situations where horses are confined for excessive periods is also considered inhumane.
  • Pushing beyond normal limits – Competitions or training that require horses to exert themselves beyond a healthy point, risking lameness, exhaustion and accidents.

Arguments That Equestrian Sports Are Cruel

With this ethical framework in mind, critics present several arguments for why equestrian sports are inherently cruel:

Horses Are Forced To Do What They Would Not Volunteer For

Horses in the wild live in herds and are prey animals – their instincts drive them to avoid conflict and exertion. Mounting, riding and training a horse requires overcoming its natural inclinations.

As horse trainer Monty Roberts notes, “Horses don’t want to be ridden…If we look at the wild horse, he will ride nothing”. The very act of breaking and training horses could thus be seen as coercive.

Competitive Training Causes Physical Harm

The training required for equestrian sports puts strain on horses physically. Studies show that dressage and show jumping horses have a high prevalence of back problems and lameness.

Ex-racehorses often have bleeding lungs, bone fractures and weakened joints. Intensive training regimes at a young age makes horses more prone to such injuries. Critics argue this is unethical exploitation.

Equipment and Methods Can Be Painful or Harmful

Certain common equipment and training methods have the potential to cause pain or distress:

  • Bits – Severe bits can bruise the mouth when the reins are pulled. Dressage horses often have irritated mouths.
  • Spurs – Although spurs may be used for subtle cues, rowel spurs can also rake and cut the horse’s side when kicked hard.
  • Whips – While whips may be intended as aids, they can easily be misused to strike horses. Studies show whip abuse is prevalent in races.
  • Nosebands – Tight nosebands prevent horses from expressing discomfort through mouth movements. But this can cause pain and fear instead.

Competition Pushes Horses Beyond Healthy Limits

In competitive events, horses are often pushed to perform strenuous activities that carry a high risk of injury. For example:

  • Jumping higher fences beyond safe levels
  • Racing faster than their natural speed
  • Performing demanding dressage moves before the body is fully developed

The demands of competition motivate excessive training regimes that can jeopardize welfare.

Horses Suffer Psychological Distress

Some argue that even humane training involves exerting human dominance over horses and suppressing their natural behaviors. Horses may display signs of stress and anxiety, such as stereotypic behaviors.

In the name of obedience, horses are subject to fear-based techniques like tight reins, scolding and spurring. This can undermine the horse’s mental wellbeing.

Arguments That Equestrian Sports Can Be Done Humanely

Defenders of equestrian sports don’t deny that abuse exists. However, they argue that cruelty is not inherent, and that horses can participate ethically under the right conditions:

Many Horses Enjoy Equine Sports When Treated Well

Proponents argue most horses do not actively resist human direction. With positive reinforcement training, many horses display willingness and even enthusiasm for exercise and competition. They are adapted for athleticism and exertion when allowed to progress at a natural pace.

Happy horses often form bonds with riders and trainers. Positive experiences and humane treatment can make equestrian activities enriching for horses rather than coercive.

Injuries Can Be Prevented With Proper Training and Care

It is true that competitive horses have higher injury rates. However, good trainers take care to build up the horse’s abilities gradually, focusing on slow development of muscles and joints to preventstrain.

Rest periods, good nutrition, veterinary care and safe facilities also lower injury risks. Racehorses often start too young, but some jurisdictions now have minimum age requirements.

Ethical Use of Equipment and Training Exists

Mild bits, spurs and whips cause no harm when used correctly as subtle communication aids. Likewise, non-harmful equipment like bitless bridles is increasingly common.

The problem lies in severe equipment and forceful riding. But techniques based on patience and positive reinforcement are healthy for both horse and rider when applied conscientiously.

Oversight Prevents Excessive Demands

Modern regulations protect competitor horses in most venues. For example, jumps, races and dressage moves are limited to safe parameters for the age and ability level. Races have vet checks. Show stewards can penalize abuse.

Laws against animal cruelty also apply to the equestrian world. Though gaps exist, increasing oversight reduces excessive demands on horses.

Public Attitudes Towards Equestrian Sports

Currently, public opinion on equestrian sports is split:

  • 53% of people believe activities like horse racing and rodeo are ethically acceptable.
  • 37% feel they are unacceptable due to cruelty concerns.
  • 10% are undecided, saying it depends on the circumstances.

However, critical voices are growing louder. With greater scientific understanding of equine psychology and capabilities, more people argue that exploitation can never be justified, no matter how “humane” the training.

Some advocate banning coercive equipment outright, limiting the time and intensity horses can be ridden, or prohibiting activities like racing altogether. Others call for higher standards, licensing, and piecemeal reform rather than abolishing equestrian sports completely.

More radical activists believe that no human dominion over horses is ethical. Just as animals have rights, so do horses deserve autonomy. In this view, horses are not “ours” to train for any purpose, no matter how benign. Their consent and wellbeing should be the priority.

Towards an Ethical Position on Equestrian Sports

There are good-faith arguments on both sides of this issue, often clouded by incomplete science and personal values. Developing an ethical view requires weighing these factors judiciously:

  • The latest evidence on horse psychology, needs, capabilities and experience of harm.
  • Ideas of justice and horses’ status – should they have rights? Can coercion ever be justified?
  • Mitigating cruelty where possible while upholding human livelihoods and traditions around horses.
  • Understanding diverse human motives – competition, connection with horses, prestige.
  • Considering how completely eliminating horse sports would affect the animals themselves, since domestic horses depend on humans.

The question boils down to where we draw the line between use and exploitation. Perhaps the boundary lies not in any blanket prohibition, but in practicing equestrian sports conscientiously, emphasizing the horse’s welfare and agency above human goals.

More debate, empathy and nuance is required to find where this line falls for different equine activities. But one thing is certain – any use of horses must be grounded in compassion and ethics. The conversation cannot be reduced to simplistic judgments of right or wrong. Our responsibility is to engage earnestly with diverse views to reach thoughtful conclusions. Only through open and earnest discourse can we develop practices that balance humanity’s needs with equine dignity.

About The Author

Scroll to Top