What Happened with James Charles?

This post may contain affiliate links. If you click one, I may earn a commission at no cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Key Takeaways:

  • James Charles faced backlash for racist tweets about Africa and Ebola in 2021.
  • He was accused of inappropriate conversations and “grooming” minors in 2021.
  • James posted a video defending himself but also apologizing for hurting others.
  • In 2023, he asked the internet to “un-cancel” him regarding the grooming allegations.
  • The controversies have impacted his career, mental health, and support for his new makeup brand.


James Charles is a prominent figure in the beauty community on YouTube and social media. With over 25 million subscribers on YouTube alone, he has amassed a substantial following and influence. However, his meteoric rise to fame has not been without its share of controversies and allegations.

The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive chronological summary of the key events that have transpired regarding James Charles over the past few years. The aim is to evaluate in an unbiased manner the controversies, allegations, responses, and impacts on James Charles’ career and reputation. The depth of coverage and objective analysis will help readers understand this complex situation and the timeline of what transpired.

Gaining insight into influencer controversies is valuable for promoting accountability and making informed decisions about content creators to support. Furthermore, understanding the impacts of scandals and allegations can underscore the importance of responsible conduct for influencers and determination of suitable consequences.

This article will methodically cover the racist tweets, inappropriate communications with minors, response video, recent “un-cancel” request, effects on career and mental health, and current public perception of James Charles. By evaluating these key events holistically, readers will learn about this evolving situation and gain useful takeaways regarding influencer culture.

Timeline of Controversies, Allegations, and Impacts

Racist Tweets About Africa and Ebola Draw Criticism

In May 2021, James Charles posted a series of tweets that many deemed racist and offensive about Africa and the Ebola virus. In the now-deleted tweets, he perpetuated harmful stereotypes and stigmatized Africa while making light of a deadly disease. The backlash from fans and the general public was swift and intense.

While James deleted the problematic tweets soon after posting them, the damage was already done. Screenshots of the tweets circulated widely, and James faced ongoing criticism for using his platform irresponsibly. He eventually posted an apology on his Instagram Story acknowledging that the tweets were offensive and hurtful. However, many felt the apology was inadequate given the gravity of the situation. This event highlighted concerns about racial insensitivity and ignorance on James’ part.

What Happened with James Charles?

Accusations of Grooming Minors Prompt Action from YouTube

Later in 2021, allegations surfaced that James Charles had inappropriate communications with multiple minors on social media. Several boys and young men posted screenshots and videos alleging that James had messaged them flirtatiously on platforms like Snapchat, despite knowing they were underage.

The accusations claimed James demonstrated a pattern of using his fame, wealth, and influence to interact with minors in an inappropriate and manipulative manner. This alleged behavior prompted intense backlash and the term “grooming” was used extensively to describe the misconduct.

As a result of the grooming accusations going viral, YouTube demonetized James’ channel during its investigation. This penalty suspended his ability to earn advertising revenue on his videos. While not a definitive measure of guilt, YouTube’s actions signaled the seriousness of the allegations against a top creator on their platform.

James Charles Responds with “No More Lies” Video

Following the grooming accusations, James Charles posted a video titled “No More Lies” in May 2021 addressing the situation. In the video, watched over 35 million times, James apologized generally for his past problematic behavior. However, he denied grooming or sexting with minors intentionally.

James acknowledged flirting with some fans not knowing their age but provided evidence that he had been deceived. He presented screenshots indicating that two accusers had lied about their ages to him. James also pointed to his millions of social media messages, noting a tiny fraction were inappropriate.

While denying the most serious grooming allegations, James apologized for carelessness in flirting with fans and putting himself in situations raising concerns. He acknowledged his fame, power imbalance with fans, and lack of thorough vetting enabled inappropriate interactions to occur. However, James asserted false accusations and exaggerations were also rampant.

The video demonstrated James’ PR strategy of mixing apologies with evidence intended to alter the narrative. While some felt the response was adequate, others maintained it failed to take meaningful accountability for facilitating misconduct.

Recent Request for Internet to “Un-cancel” Him

In July 2023, over two years after the grooming scandal erupted, James Charles posted a video titled “Hi Sisters” reflecting on the fallout and asking viewers to “un-cancel” him. He described the grooming accusations as the “scariest time” in his life and shared the immense mental health impacts, including suicidal thoughts.

James clarified he was not asking to be forgiven or for people to forget what happened. However, he asked for a chance to redeem himself after a long gap with no scandals or allegations. James implied he had learned from his past mistakes and worked on accountability and personal growth behind the scenes.

The video represented his plea to the internet to allow him to rebuild his career. While some sympathized with James and felt ready to move on, others argued more tangible accountability, reparations, and change were required. Significant skepticism remains on whether redemption is deserved or possible for James Charles given the severity of the grooming accusations.

Controversies Have Negatively Impacted Career and Mental Health

The repeated controversies and grooming allegations against James Charles have clearly damaged his once illustrious career at its height. While still maintaining a substantial following, he has lost deals, sponsorships, and professional opportunities. YouTube restricted his monetization for over a year during their investigation.

Morphe cut ties with James in 2021 soon after the grooming accusations surfaced. He has struggled to attract brand partnerships since. The new makeup brand James founded called PAINTED has faced boycott calls and reluctance from former fans to purchase products. Even close friends like the D’Amelio sisters stopped collaborating with him.

Beyond career impacts, James has been open about the mental health toll relating to feeling “canceled” after the scandals. In the “Hi Sisters” video, he admitted to suicidal thoughts, immense loneliness, and other struggles while “going through hell and back.” Seeking redemption on the internet highlights James’ deep desire to move forward after a period of disgrace and depression.

Questions and Analysis on What Happened with James Charles

What Exactly Was James Charles Accused of Regarding Minors?

James Charles was accused primarily of using his fame and influence to groom, flirt with, and manipulate minors into inappropriate communications. While the most serious allegations of explicit misconduct were denied, Charles admitted to being reckless in flirting with those he did not verify the age of.

Screenshots posted by alleged victims depicted flirtatious messages sent by James. While not overtly sexual, they raised concerns about boundary crossing and manipulation of power dynamics. Most critically, James Charles was accused of continuing such communications even after learning the individual was under 18. But concrete evidence of this remains limited.

Overall, while the term “grooming” became a common accusation, the specifics of misconduct remain ambiguous. However, the inappropriate interactions Charles admitted to represent an abuse of his influence that violated the trust placed in him by fans.

Why Was the Backlash Against James Charles So Intense?

The backlash against James Charles intensified for several reasons. As one of the most prominent online influencers at the time, with a heavily young audience, higher standards of conduct were expected from him. Parents felt betrayed and concerned for their children’s safety.

Additionally, the string of scandals like the racist tweets fostered an image of James Charles as chronically troubled and problematic. The repeated grooming accusations from different alleged victims created a pattern that was deeply alarming.

Furthermore, the long silence from James Charles before responding fueled speculation of guilt. Dramas and cancellations spread rapidly in internet culture. James Charles was a prime target for severe backlash given the troubling nature of grooming and his massive reach and fame.

The intensity of the backlash was understandable, even if the definitive truth of the allegations remained murky. The outcry reflected societal disgust at any potential abuse of power and trust by an influencer.

Are the Accusations and Evidence Against James Charles Conclusive?

While the outcry against James Charles was understandable, the accusations and evidence presented are difficult to classify as categorically conclusive. James offered plausible counter evidence in his response video indicating some accusers misrepresented interactions.

However, James also acknowledged blindly flirting with fans was irresponsible, even if inadvertent. Definitively proving grooming requires exhaustive documentation of communication patterns and intentional manipulation. The sample screenshots and videos shared offer clues but no smoking gun.

It remains impossible to determine the truth of what private conversations between James Charles and certain accusers consisted of. The lack of firm evidence limits clear conclusions on the most severe allegations. But it does not absolve James of ethical breaches in vetting fans and exercising prudence as an influencer.

Overall, the available information depicts a deeply concerning but not conclusively documented pattern of inappropriate conduct requiring accountability. But the legal standard of clear evidence was never met to validate the most damning grooming claims spread virally.

What Further Actions Could James Charles Take to Show Accountability?

While James Charles apologized generally and expressed regret, more substantive accountability could involve:

  • Further addressing specific accusations from alleged victims and taking responsibility.
  • Making amends through donations to non-profits supporting youth welfare.
  • Hiring an oversight team to monitor all communications with fans.
  • Attending counseling to understand problematic behavior.
  • Working with counselors to implement a minor-safety plan for interactions.
  • Collaborating with child psychology experts to make amends and atone through education on grooming prevention.

Public figures can work with professionals to demonstrate accountability beyond surface apologies. James Charles could use his resources and platform to prevent grooming rather than lament cancelation.

Is it Responsible for the Public to “Un-cancel” James Charles Now?

Whether the public should “un-cancel” James Charles is debatable. On one hand, permanent condemnation without paths to redemption breeds hopelessness. People can learn and grow from even serious mistakes.

However, “cancellation” also represents consequences for breaching public trust. Critics argue James has not atoned enough or shown substantive change. Immediate redemption could signal inappropriate behavior has no lasting impacts for influencers.

Responsible judgment may involve cautiously accepting his return while requiring further accountability and changed behavior over time. Remaining vigilant on grooming issues provides incentives for James to rebuild trust through ongoing positive actions rather than platitudes.


The controversies surrounding James Charles highlight how positions of fame bear increased responsibilities towards young fans. While definitive evidence remains lacking regarding some allegations, his admitted behavior demonstrates irresponsibility and ethical lapses.

However, the disproportionate toxicity of “cancel culture” also raises concerns on lack of space for growth and learning. With cautious skepticism, perhaps partial redemption could motivate positive change from James Charles. But such redemption can only stem from substantive accountability and reparations for those harmed, rather than performative apologies.

Determining suitable consequences requires nuance and context. But at minimum, James Charles must alter old patterns, show tangible growth, and use his position responsibly moving forward. Ongoing vigilance for any misconduct can balance second chances with necessary precautions.

Provided these actions occur, “un-canceling” James Charles cautiously could potentially signal the power of restorative justice. The court of public opinion lacks due process, so openness to redemption remains important. Still, any restored trust must be re-earned through new behavior and atonement for the accused wrongs which launched countless doubts and questions around James Charles’ conduct.

About The Author

Scroll to Top